Security
Access control, input validation, sensitive data handling, and risky data flow changes.
Quality checks
Work reaches you after it has been challenged.
Reduzer AI reviews pull requests for security, code quality, and UI/UX risk. Humans decide what matters, engineers fix it, and QA verifies what should be checked before handoff.
The quality path is a handoff gate: review signal, human decision, fix, QA note, then client inspection.
What gets checked
The review layer looks for practical engineering risk.
The review focuses on issues that can affect security, maintainability, user experience, or release confidence.
Code quality
Logic errors, edge cases, error handling, performance risks, and maintainability issues.
UI/UX
Responsive behavior, empty states, accessibility, component consistency, and user-flow breaks.
Handoff readiness
Regression notes, staging context, test steps, known limits, and what needs client inspection.
When review finds an issue
Catching an issue only matters if someone owns the fix.
Reduzer turns review findings into a clear path: judge the risk, return the fix, verify where relevant, and prepare the work for client inspection.
- 01PR reviewed
Reduzer AI checks the pull request against enabled security, quality, and UX rules.
- 02Finding judged
A human reviewer separates real risk from review noise
- 03Fix returned
The engineer resolves the issue with the context attached to the task or PR.
- 04QA checked
Relevant fixes are verified in staging or regression notes before handoff.
- 05Handoff ready
You receive the staging link, test steps, QA note, and remaining context.
Proof artifact
The handoff shows the quality path behind the result.
The release readiness record shows what was reviewed, who fixed it, whether QA passed, and what you need to inspect.
Review comment with evidenceFix note or resolved threadQA/regression noteStaging link and test steps